CC case studies book draft available



There is a draft version of Volume 1 of the Creative Commons Case Studies Book is available for perusal. The book is sectioned into clusters, drawing together examples of people and projects using Creative Commons around the Asia-Pacific.
Creative Commons licences have had a significant impact world-wide, with millions of creators opting to share their content with their peers. Since its inception in 2002, the Creative Commons initiative has shown stellar growth. Numerous communities have emerged, inspired and founded on the CC licensing scheme, and the recognition, collaboration, and commercialisation opportunities it provides.
This book is the first attempt to chronicle the tales of the Australasian commons. 
Featuring over 60 case studies, it maps the current state of play surrounding free culture in the region. From private individuals to large corporations, the studies clearly show the mechanisms and motivations to share and experiment without the restrictions of the pre-digital era. Across the domains of democratic change, filmmaking, music, visual arts, libraries, museums, government, education and research, Australasian creators are making their mark. We encourage you to contribute your stories at the Creative Commons case studies wiki: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/casestudies.
Keep in mind, it is still a draft version. There are a few silly little errors which we will fix before it goes to print.

iSummit 2008 :: Gamble 005, 006 & 007

Morning tea called for sugar and there was plenty to masticate.


Gamble 005



This was great! A little biscuit like a milk arrowroot with a thick chocolate base. *salivates* 

The verdict: You'll be better for it (4)

Gamble 006



This biscuit was nothing to special really, but you have to love that it is called Crunky!

The verdict: take a gamble (3)

Gamble 007



Think Subway cookie: floppy, soft and doughy. Not so good.

The verdict: take a gamble (3)

Heather Ford's introductory keynote was a much needed 'let's step back' and reflect on what it is that the collective 'we' of the commons want to do. To help us think through this she posed two questions:

  1. Are we really developing global solutions to global problems?
  2. Is focusing on access rather than participation really the best outreach for the commons?
So, are we? And is access more important than participation?

iSummit 2008 :: CC international legal day overview - morning session

I am at the Creative Commons Legal Day for which I will publish my Google Notebooks for later, but I do want to say a few things about Hokkaido University Professor Yoshiyuki Tamura's keynote.

And interesting point he makes is that intellectual property conflicts with the underlying concept of Lockean Labor Theory of property.  The theory says individual property is a natural right. And property rights are the natural (and automatic) result of the exertion of labour upon natural resources. One should be entitled to the fruits of their labor.

But of course, the underlying concept of (little L) liberalism (as it exists in practice) is to limit exercising of one's rights where it affects the rights of another individual to do the same. One way to understand intellectual property is that it affects others' rights to reuse content because the owner can exclusively regulated the content. The pangs of copyright's "can't touch this" attitude.

Another important difference is that the intangibility of intellectual property means that the property can be used without excluding others which separates IP from real property which includes in the bundle of property rights the right to exclude others from enjoying/using that property. Of course that access by others is reflected in the balance between exclusive copyright right and public access (eg fair dealing exceptions). Locke himself requires that "there is enough, and as good left in common for others."

An interesting point.

Some other updates on Creative Commons

Random ideas for iSummit

I'm over in Sapporo, Japan for the iSummit and a number of thoughts are going through my head. One I often have wondered about is why the Creative Commons sampling licences are not included as part of the standard licence generator. Surly you could have a system that incorporated the sampling options within the existing questions. Something like this:

Allow commercial uses of your work?
Yes
No

Allow modifications of your work?
Yes
Yes, as long as others share alike
Yes, but only sampling of the work
No


That way if someone answered yes to commercial and yes to sampling they would generate the sampling plus licence. If someone answered no to commercial and yes to sampling they would generate the noncommercial sampling plus.

iSummit 2008 :: Gamble 003 & 004

Today a bunch of us went to the Sapporo Beer Museum. Naturally, there were many things (mainly beer) to sample. We also tried some beer nibblies:

Gamble 003



Rachel tried the Sapporo Beer Crackers. Her thoughts? "Need more beer." That doesn't mean they aren't good, just that they are definitely an accompaniment.

The verdict: take a gamble (3)

Gamble 004



These things are great! They are like tiny pringles!!

The verdict: buy in bulk (5)

iSummit 2008 :: Gamble 001 & 002

Gamble 001


This is the first gamble, an iced-tea drink purchased by me at the Haneda Airport in Tokyo as Jess and I waited for our connecting flight to Sapporo.

Although the packaging and the can is interesting, don't be fooled. I couldn't quite bring myself to finish this bitter green tea.

The verdict: back away slowly.

Gamble 002


Thankfully these tiny cream biscuits TOTALLY made up for the tea! Lemon flavour and just novel because they are so small, they look like they have been shrunk.

The verdict: buy in bulk.

iSummit 2008 :: Gamble Register

Japan is a funny place. There are so many "interesting" things to see, touch and taste. Jessica Coates, Rachel Cobcroft and I are documenting our gambles with trying some of these things. Keep up with the gamble register using the 'gamble register' tag.

Gamble Scale

Here is the scale on a 1 - 5 scale (1 being the worst and 5 being the best)


1 Request a motion sickness bag
2 Back away slowly
3 Take a gamble
4 You'll be better for it
5 Buy in bulk



the banner image is a transformative work of cc on disk by yamashita yohei, which is available under a creative commons attribution 2.0 licence.




At the core of the Creative Commons project is a suite of standardised licences that are made freely available to copyright holders and which provide a range of protections and freedoms for their material.
Creative Commons Australia is the Australian affiliate of the international Creative Commons project, funded by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation and
hosted at Queensland University of Technology in the QUT Law School Intellectual Property: Knowledge, Culture and Economy.

Creative Commons License
You can copy, distribute and remix the text of Creative Commons throught the looking glass by Elliott Bledsoe. That's because it's published under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia licence. Find out more about it here.